I attended quite a few "back to school" staff development sessions this week. I decided to get some feedback during and after the sessions to get a feel for the general attitude prior to beginning my research project. I, of course, had my own opinions on the set up and delivery of the staff development. It was in a large auditorium with a speaker system that was on the fritz, as usual. We viewed about 100 power point slides, read several articles, and reflected with our table.
Sound familiar? I have attended sessions like these my entire teaching career and always find I learn more about the people I sit next to then what the session is about! The feedback from the session was on par with my feelings: sitting for too long, went through the slides too quickly, could not hear, etc.
After the session, I decided to call a friend who led a similar staff development the week before. I wanted to get an honest opinion for the reasoning behind this set-up. I explained to her the kinds of activities we did, and how the learning did not transfer this way. She was so surprised, because she did not do any of those things and had a very successful staff development! I was very curious now.....
She integrated Pinterest, team planning, lots of music throughout the day. It sounded like a blast! Of course, she is a veteran kindergarten teacher and is a master at entertaining. However, all these things were in line with the new generation of teachers and engaging. This gave me a great starting point for my research. Although I cannot follow both groups back to their classrooms to see if they implement their learning, I can predict what types of staff developments will most likely promote this action.
Followers
Thursday, August 16, 2012
Sunday, August 12, 2012
Action Research Plan- Final
|
Friday, August 3, 2012
Action Research DRAFT
All feedback is appreciated, thanks!
|
Action Planning Template
|
||||
|
Goal: To explore the connection between
staff development and student achievement.
|
||||
|
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|
Survey the campus
before and after a staff development on information presented
Outcome: Understand the campus attitude
towards staff development
|
Katy Azanza
|
Aug. 2012-May 2013
|
-Survey
-Permission from site
supervisor
|
I will be able to
answer these questions following the survey:
What is the overall
opinion by the campus of our staff development? Do they feel it will affect
their classrooms?
|
|
Select a group of
teachers based on site supervisor’s recommendations and survey results who
are strong participants of staff development, and/or feel staff development is
a chore.
Outcome: Understand the level of implementation
by each teacher of staff development information
|
Katy Azanza
|
Aug. 2012-May 2013
|
-One on one interview
-time for classroom
observations
-9 wks. LA Data
|
Evaluate interviews
with teachers and analyze variations in class data, Is there a difference in
student achievement?
|
|
Observe administration
planning for staff development
Outcome: Understand
the process of planning for a staff development and what the expectations are
for the session
|
Katy Azanza
|
Aug 2012-Dec. 2012
|
-time for observation
|
Debrief with site
supervisor after planning, What is her objective of this staff development and
what is guiding it?
|
|
Research data from
online resources
Outcome: Understand
history behind effective staff development
|
Katy Azanza
|
Aug 2012-May 2013
|
-access to internet
|
Share findings with
site supervisor and potentially lead a successful staff development based on
what I have learned
|
|
Attend curriculum
based sessions during February conference with campus members, survey
afterwards
Outcome:
Understand the opinion
of the sessions by my campus and probability of implementation into classroom
|
Katy Azanza
|
Feb. 2013-May 2013
|
-Survey
-Classroom
observations
|
After attending the
conference, identify through observations and interviews: What causes the
teachers to bring what they learned into the classroom?
|
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)